Member-only story
Are Small Dogs Really Dumb? Unveiling the Science in This Journal Club Must-Read
Are smaller dogs truly less intelligent and more difficult to train than their larger counterparts?
This common belief has sparked debates among dog enthusiasts and researchers alike. In a groundbreaking analysis by authors Mark Rishniw and Curtis W. Dewey, these questions are rigorously examined, shedding light on the factors influencing canine behavior and cognition. By dissecting the interplay between breed size, training efforts, and perceived temperament, Rishniw and Dewey offer valuable insights into the complexities of canine intelligence.
Their meticulous review challenges prevailing notions, prompting readers to reconsider their assumptions about small dog breeds and their capabilities.
Big vs. Small
Small dog breeds have often been labeled as less trainable and sociable compared to their larger counterparts, perpetuating a common belief without substantial behavioral evidence.
There is a prevailing notion that larger breeds outperform smaller ones in social cognition tasks, as highlighted in studies such as Helton and Helton (2010). However, conflicting findings exist, with some research questioning methodologies and failing to establish a clear correlation between brain size and…
